“Where's the difference? I allow my experiences to be recorded by a machine that accompanies me everywhere I go. The machine misses nothing, and it's so efficient at anticipating my queries that I barely have to ask it anything.“
“The machine is vulnerable. “
“lt's backed up at regular intervals. And it's no more vulnerable than a cluster of implants inside my head.
Sorry, but that just isn't a reasonable objection. “
“You're right, of course. But there's a deeper argument against the AM. It's too perfect. It doesn't know how to distort or forget. “
“lsn't that the point?”
“Not exactly. When you recall something—this conversation, perhaps, a hundred years from now-there will be things about it that you misremember. Yet those misremembered details will themselves become part of your memory, gaining solidity and texture with each instance of recall. A thousand years from now, your memory of this conversation might bear little resemblance with reality. Yet you'd swear your recollection was accurate. “
"But if the AM had accompanied me, I'd have a flawless record of how things really were."
"You would," Zima said. "But that isn't living memory. It's photography; a mechanical recording process. It freezes out the imagination; leaves no scope for details to be selectively misremembered." He paused long enough to top up my glass. "Imagine that on nearly every occasion when you had cause to sit outside on an afternoon like this you had chosen red wine over white, and generally had no reason to regret that choice. But on one occasion, for one reason or another, you were persuaded to choose white —against the judgement of the AM—and it was wonderful. Everything came together magically: the company, the conversation, the late afternoon ambience, the splendid view, the euphoric rush of being slightly drunk. A perfect afternoon turned into a perfect evening."
“这两种又有什么区别了？我允许我的经历被一个无论到哪里都陪伴着我的机器记录。这台机器从来没有遗漏任何事情，而且它回复我的查询是如此的高效，以至于现在几乎每件事我都要问它。”
“机器很容易损坏。”
“它每隔一定时间就会备份数据。而且它总不会比我脑袋里的一大堆神经移植模块更容易损坏吧。对不起冒犯了你，但是机器容易损坏这个反对的理由实在不合理。”
“当然你是对的。但是对于备忘录助手有更深层次的争论。它太完美了。它不知道如何失真或者遗忘。”“它不就应该这样吗？”
“不对！当你在几百年后用自己的头脑回忆起我和你的这段对话，肯定有一些事情会记错了。而这些记错的部分也会变成你记忆中的一部分，记错的每个细节会逐渐强化成回忆。一千年之后了，你对这段对话的回忆可能跟真实情况就大相径庭了。然而那时你肯定会发誓，你的回忆是准确的。”
“但是如果有备忘录助手陪在我的身边，我就能事无巨细地把事情的真相完整地记录下来。”
“你会的，”齐玛说，“但那不是活生生的记忆。那只是摄影，一个机械记忆的过程。整个记忆里缺乏想象，没有给选择性的遗忘留下任何余地。”他又给我满上了一杯酒。“想象一下，像今天下午这样的场合，你因为某个原因坐在外面，你必须要决定是选择红葡萄酒还是白葡萄酒，还不能后悔自己的选择。但是就这么一次，不管是什么原因，你被人说服去选择白葡萄酒——正好违背了备忘录助手的判断——而且喝了之后你还感觉很好。每件事都被奇妙地组合在一起：这段谈话、夕阳西下的氛围、壮丽的风景、微醺的快感。一个完美的下午逐渐变成了完美的傍晚。”
用户评论